European Market Entry Sprint
For technology companies entering Europe, or opening a new European market. One of two flagship I.O.V interventions — not the whole studio.
Two weeks, run by the founder, to establish where to play in Europe, who to sell to, which partners carry distribution, and what the first ninety days should prove — before you commit to a full local expansion team.
Scope follows the decision, not a fixed package. Price is confirmed in writing before anything starts.
Both paths open the same short contact form — the founder reads and replies himself.
Home market
Europe is our home market.
Built in Europe, useful globally: the studio is most valuable to US, Asian and global companies entering Europe, and to European companies opening a second or third European market.
Working on an agentic operating model instead? Agentic Systems →
A — Who this is for
Companies with a product that works and a market they have not read yet.
- Newly funded AI and fintech companies with Europe on the next-stage plan.
- Payments and infrastructure companies facing European regulation as a market question.
- Web3 and frontier-technology companies where the ecosystem is the distribution.
- Global technology companies opening a first or second European market.
B — What you leave with
Eight artifacts, all of them operable.
Market and competitor map
Who already occupies the space in Europe, how they are positioned, and where the opening actually is.
ICP and customer architecture
Which European buyers move first, who signs, who blocks, and what the buying unit looks like locally.
European partner landscape
Platforms, integrators, institutions, associations and regulators that carry distribution in this market.
30–50 priority accounts
A named list of accounts and counterparties, ordered by reachability rather than logo value.
Positioning and GTM sequence
The position stated in one sentence, then the order of moves that makes it credible in Europe.
Strategic partnership routes
Which partnership shapes are worth pursuing, in what order, and what each one costs you to run.
Qualified introductions
Where a relationship is genuinely relevant and available, we open it. Introductions are never promised as a guaranteed output.
90-day execution plan
What your team runs after the sprint, with owners, sequence and the first proof to aim at.
C — How the two weeks run
Week one · Read
Immersion in your product, pipeline and thesis, then the European field: operators, buyers, partners, regulation, competitors.
Week two · Name and sequence
Position, ICP, partner routes and the named account list, argued against your own team rather than presented to it.
Hand-off
One working session on the 90-day plan, and the material stays yours to operate without us.
D — After the sprint
Where it makes sense, the sprint continues as a fractional, embedded strategic engagement: partner conversations, positioning, pilots and first proof, run with your team.
Scoped separately, in writing, after the sprint. Senior and vendor-neutral — not a local hire, not an agency team, no headcount to absorb.
The studio is currently taking one to two strategic engagements.
E — Evidence
European market building is the studio's filed record: enterprise adoption in DACH with ConsenSys, developer distribution with BNB Chain, market entry across European markets with Bit2Me. Each dossier carries the decision, the act and the first proof.
Which European market are you trying to read?
Tell us the market, the stage and the deadline in a paragraph. If a sprint is the wrong instrument for it, we say so plainly.